How to Digest a Case: FORMAT

 FORMAT OF A CASE DIGEST


TITLE:


Include the petitioner and respondents of the case and the reference. Sometimes, students only

include the Volume Number of the Supreme Court Reports Annotated (SCRA)/Philippine

Reports (Phil) and the first page where the case appeared or written. Others only include

the Gazette Record Number together with the Date of the case. Still, others include both. Others

even add the

ponente

or the justice that penned the case.


FACTS:


There is no need to include all the facts. Just include those that are relevant to the subject. The

contents of the facts must be brief and concise. It must be limited to the main facts of the case

which of course should focus on the particular subject assigned.


ISSUES:


Include only those that are relevant. Issues are usually framed in the form of questions that are

answerable by "yes" or "no," for example, "Is the contract void? “Sometimes, students frame the

question by starting it with the word "whether," for example, "Whether the contract is void" or

"Whether or not the contract is void." The answer to the question has to be answered in the

ruling. Furthermore, the issue must have some bearing on the facts above written. There must be

a connection between the facts presented and the issued that must be resolved.


RULING:


This usually starts with a "yes" or a "no." This is the answer to the question/s involving the issue.

After the categorical yes/no answer, the reason for the decision will be explained. Of course, the

ruling must be based on the facts and issues written. Concentrate on how the Supreme Court

decided on the facts in question. It is advisable that your digest shows that you understand what

the case is all about and that you can elaborate more on the rulings given by the Supreme Court

as long as it is within the decision of the case.


Source: 
TIPS IN CASE DIGEST.docx. (n.d.). Scribd. https://www.scribd.com/document/321796911/TIPS-IN-CASE-DIGEST-docx

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CRIM PRO Digest: Enrile v. Sandiganbayan (G.R. Nos. 213847)

CRIM PRO Digest: Soria and Bista v. Desierto, et.al. (G.R. Nos. 153254-25)